The Rejected "Gods"
Once again, Einstein fights the reality of physical measurements and offers “his explanation of optical Doppler effect by his divine calculations.”
A constant duration of interaction of each wave with an observer at the constant speed of observer-to-light relative motion (C) leaves no room for optical Left Doppler Effect
- Allan Zade
As you can see now, there is not a single aspect that is correct in the delusion called "the theory of relativity." To make the situation even worse, "god-Einstein" uses Zeus fakement to "confirm" the credibility of his "calculations." he claims that he "explained the Michelson-Morley experiment, optical Doppler effect, introduced length contraction, and so on." That is nothing more than Zeus fakement because modern one-way experiments disprove all such claims of a false "god."
More than that. “God-Einstein” had crossed the red line, “impenetrable” even for divine entities. That is “trespassing in the area of responsibility of another god – Cronus.” That god was ever responsible for Time. (see ‘The Human illusion of Time’ ref. # 1)
That trespassing made an even higher delusion in Einstein’s mind. He claimed that time dilation occurs for an observer in motion. In other words, something that does not even exist (physical Time, see ‘Human illusion of Time’) possessed attributes of dilation, “compression”, “distortion”, and so on. He covered that delusion by Zeus fakement as usual.
More than that. He "invented" the concept of the so-called "unification of space and time." He called it "space-time continuum" by the addition of the fourth axis to the three other "dimensions" known before him (see above).
As well as Descartes, he never shows the physical appearance of any of those “dimensions.” For example, have you ever seen a “physical time axis” coming through your watch? No, you had not! However, Einstein insists that delusion is real because of “his divine power,” which makes the situation even worse.
Mortals, deluded by such “greatest ideas,” try to follow the “path of gods” using a similar approach to the problems. Such a journey always ends up with the creation of even heavier delusion. For example, M-theory (which appeared later than Einstein’s works) tries to “explain everything” by “divine power of calculations” once again. Mortal, who “invented” that theory, thought that he would be another “god.” He “created a continuum with 12 dimensions.” (The higher the better.) However, nobody (including the author of that “theory”) has ever shown any of those “dimensions” as physical entities in a lab. Today, M-theory is mainly known to a little group of “experts,” and the mortal who “invented that theory” remains mortal instead of “a god” because “mortals cannot fight the gods.” Therefore,
It is impossible to fight the idea of "a god" in the mind of a believer, despite the nature of that "god." It can be anything hammered into the believer's mind, including Zeus, Jupiter, Mars, Newton, Michelson, Einstein, and so on, to infinity.
- Allan Zade
As a result, independent researchers often meet believers instead of the rational scientific community. Such "scientists" can be easily detected by sharing the results of edge experiments with them. An edge experiment is an experiment that appears for the first time and has not been conducted before, such as De Witte one-way experiment in a Belgatelecom lab (1991). Another good example comes from the CERN faster-than-light neutrino experiment.
Apparently, Einstein’s worshipers are nonplussed after any such experiments. Moreover, their reaction is no different from the reaction of all other believers. The best example comes from the execution of Giordano Bruno. He was burnt at the stake because he “showed disrespect to the God who told mortals that the Earth is flat and it is the center of the universe.”
Bruno was tried for heresy by the Roman Inquisition on charges of denial of several core Catholic doctrines, including eternal damnation, the Trinity, the deity of Christ, the virginity of Mary, and transubstantiation. Bruno's pantheism was not taken lightly by the church, nor was his teaching of metempsychosis regarding the reincarnation of the soul. The Inquisition found him guilty, and he was burned at the stake in Rome's Campo de' Fiori in 1600. After his death, he gained considerable fame, being particularly celebrated by 19th- and early 20th-century commentators who regarded him as a martyr for science. Some historians are of the opinion his heresy trial was not a response to his cosmological views but rather a response to his religious and afterlife views, while others find the main reason for Bruno's death was indeed his cosmological views. Bruno's case is still considered a landmark in the history of free thought and the emerging sciences.
- Ref. # 2
What happened next? Has humankind become smarter because of his execution? No, it has not. Has humankind become more tolerant of the idea of “free thought?” No, it has not.
That happened because “old gods” were replaced with “new gods.” However, the human mind itself was neither “replaced.” The best example comes from Roland De Witte’s life. The first researcher who detected the Aurora Effect, passed the cognitive dissonance in his mind and understood its true nature, became useless to “modern science.” The reaction of the community to his actions in the 1990s was similar to the response to the actions of Giordano Bruno in the 16th century.
De Witte was not executed. However, he was unable to publish his works or share his findings with others, which is akin to executing a person. Therefore, De Witte’s life raises a huge question about “the history of free thought.”
Modern "worshipers" turn out of any facts that disprove "their gods" because such facts do not find any room in the believer's mind. Despite all the centuries that have passed and claims of a science free from any "gods," humankind still understands reality through the application of categories of unquestioning belief and worships false "gods" by the "revelation" of false prophets.
- Allan Zade
A set of fundamental categories in the human mind remains “correct” (unchallenged) only between two consequent paradigm shifts.
Each paradigm shift disproves “the old gods” and creates new categories in the human mind. Unfortunately, the human mind treats those new categories as “new unquestionable gods.” The worst aspect of that process is this. The human mind still relies on categories of unquestioning belief rather than rational thought.
Therefore, only unified efforts of independent researchers and others who are not blinded by “the shining glory” of the false “gods” lead to the success of the human mind in the new millennium.
- Allan Zade
The latest major paradigm shifts comprise:
- Invention of the telescope by Galileo Galley (1609, Italy)
- Michelson experiment (1881, Germany)
- Roland De Witte experiment (1991, Belgium)
- Publication of the book ‘Z-theory and its applications’ (2011, US/UK ) (which eliminated physical time, introduced universal Z-Continuum, and explained Transpositions)
