The Rejected "Gods"

Using a similar “technique”, Albert Einstein appeared in physics. From the beginning of his “theory,” he conducted numerous “gedankenexperiments” (thought experiments) in complete disagreement with the scientific method, which requires physical evidence to support any scientific claim.

As a result, Einstein’s mind became so deluded that he could no longer think rationally. For example, he conducted his “famous light riding” experiment numerous times. The “experiment” shows this. Light has a constant speed for any observer, regardless of their conditions of motion. In other words, Einstein claimed that light always has a constant speed of propagation with respect to anything else, including another light. Perhaps it looks fine for “gedankenexperiments,” but it is certainly wrong for physics.

For example, now this. There is a pulse of light that moves in some direction. It maintains the speed of light as observed by the observer (according to Einstein’s point of view). Everything looks fine until you take another step in your mind and split that pulse into two or more pulses, which is physically possible. However, such an easy “gedankenexperiment” puts Einstein in a quandary because it requires an immediate change in the speed of both pulses relative to each other, but to maintain the same initial speed relative to the observer. In other words,

That problem happens because “the greatest thinker” had no idea about light pulses, which appeared many decades later in the labs. “The greatest theory” is filled with such nonsense. Moreover, Einstein confirms his “sin” himself.

Indeed, that is the point of view of a religious person. It puts internal imagination, or "the level of the gods," beyond facts, which is impossible in science. In other words,

The human Imagination is and was responsible for all “gods” that flooded the human mind for centuries. In the 20th century, they came again to humankind in the form of “new gods of mathematics.” The best example of such a “god” comes from “the theory of relativity.” According to all one-way experiments, the Aurora Effect shows the observer to medium relative motion in the form shown in Figure 2

Figure 2. Aurora Experiment

Light waves form a perfect sphere S in the medium (Z-Continuum) from the point of its emission (point O). For any given duration D that wave covers some distance in the z-continuum equal to the radius of sphere S. For the same duration, the observer covers the distance OB. Therefore, in the observer-bound reference frame, light covers a variable distance that depends on the direction of observer-to-medium relative motion. As a result, all one-way experiments exhibit the same pattern of changing duration during the sidereal revolution of the planet. “God-Einstein” had no idea about that because such experiments were inaccessible at his time.

Therefore, a given observer (Fig. 2) detects the lowest distance covered by light in the direction BC and the longest distance covered by the same light in the opposite direction BA (by the same duration of light propagation). All other directions keep their distances according to the angle between them and the direction of the absolute motion of the observer (OC). That is the essence of the Aurora Effect, unknown to Einstein.

Therefore, his “greatest equation” that OB (the speed of the observer in the medium) plus OC (the speed of light in the same medium) equals OC is complete nonsense. As mentioned above,

Statement E is correct for any wave-medium combination. As a result, a moving airplane never “speeds up” its sound waves and meets the sound barrier at the same speed of sound-to-air relative motion.

That inertial effect appears only for inertial objects in the form of the Galilean transformation of velocities. (ref. # 1) “The god-Einstein” has no idea about such a difference. That so-called “equation or revelation of mathematical god” only supports the concept of the non-inertial nature of light. However, Einstein’s mind, deluded by the Galilean transformation, thinks only in one way, which views light as inertial corpuscles, a concept dating back to Newton’s time and works. Therefore, Newton’s point of view on light is wrong again because light is not an inertial object. In other words,