The Voice of Allan Zade
From the time of publication of ‘Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy’ the humankind was so impressed with quantitative explanation given by Newton that every mathematician try to make “some metathetical model to help physics” further on.
One more hidden question raised here. Mathematics as a way of thoughts uses categories of the human mind. Therefore, those categories cannot be applied one-to-one to physical properties of physical entities.
For example, a trajectory is an artificial category coming from mathematics. Therefore, you cannot find such an entity in the physical world. In other words, there is no physical experiment that shows you a trajectory of a given object in the Universe. Despite that, mathematics developed over time, pretending that its categories are real, as well as other physical entities. Such a point of view led to the heaviest delusions of humankind.
A good example comes from René Decart, who lived before Newton, and Newton also inherited his findings.
René Descartes (31 March 1596 – 11 February 1650) was a French philosopher, scientist, and mathematician, widely considered a seminal figure in the emergence of modern philosophy and science. Mathematics was paramount to his method of inquiry, and he connected the previously separate fields of geometry and algebra into analytic geometry.
One of Descartes's most enduring legacies was his development – together with Pierre de Fermat – of Cartesian or analytic geometry, which uses algebra to describe geometry; the Cartesian coordinate system is named after him.
- Ref. # 1
Later, the Cartesian coordinate system was widely used in physics. However, its application has one well-hidden problem. The Cartesian coordinate system and its sub-categories, as well as any other category of mathematics, come from the human mind. Therefore, those categories do not exist in the physical world.
Despite that, mathematicians push physicists and the human mind in general to believe that their findings are factual, as well as other physical entities. That makes a massive distortion in the human mind. For example, modern physics tells you that space has three dimensions. Why? It is because of the application of the Cartesian coordinate system to space that the idea of "condition of space" arises. In fact, those "dimensions or coordinates" do exist only in the human mind (as well as mathematics itself). But mathematicians use Zeus fakement to push humankind to think in another way and mistake their artificial categories as real.
A common way for a mathematician to twist your mind is this. “Look! The result of the given experiment aligns with my calculations. Therefore, my calculations and all other categories that I used in mathematics are real!” That is pure Zeus fakement as explained above.
For example, have you ever seen a physical X-axis going through your house? No, you had not! Have you ever seen a physical Y-axis going along the road when you drive your car? No, you had not! Have you ever seen a physical Z-axis through the aircraft window during its descent? No, you had not! However, you do believe in a three-dimensional world. Why? You do so because you still believe in “god-Descartes” yet. Therefore,
Mathematics as a way of thought gives some quantitative (numerical) description of some physical processes under some specific conditions, instead of a qualitative description (in-depth physical explanation) of those processes and their interrelation (interaction)
- Allan Zade
Later experiments revealed the wave nature of light and disproved the existence of corpuscles. At the same time, a new question was raised in the human mind about he reference frame of light. Some decades later, Albert Abraham Michelson proposed his speculations in the form of “scientific work.” He speculated that a beam of light has a different duration in different directions of propagation when measured by a round-trip experiment in the case of relative motion between the observer and the medium. He supported his speculations (or way of thought) with some calculations.
He also conducted that experiment with his interferometer. The experiment immediately disproved all his speculations despite “his mathematical support.” That is a critical aspect of physics. A thinker has some a priori knowledge about a given physical problem. He proposed an experiment to confirm his perspective on the problem. There are two possibilities after the experiment. The a priori point of view can be confirmed or disproved by a posteriori (after experimental knowledge).
An experiment confirms a given point of view if
- Allan Zade