Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

The person in the movie is someone who pays for “research.” He does not really care who brings him the result, Dr. Jones or Dr. Schneider. He has a keen interest only in the result itself, regardless of how it is obtained. In broader thought, that person depicts some people who “control science” and direct the research this or that way.

Sometimes, when scientists refuse to do something or use a given action, it creates conflicts between “the governing body” and science. The movie shows that aspect. It is shot in Dr. Jones’ father when Dr. Jones refuses to go further in “his research.”

Pic. 4. Blood

At the next stage of scientific progress, both competitors reach the holy grail, the desirable result of their research. "The governing body" also reaches the grail but suddenly realizes there are many grails instead of one.

That is the cornerstone of research. What appears to be only one idea during research appears as many different ideas at the end of research. Therefore, it is not easy to choose the right idea and separate it from all the other wrong ideas.

The person articulates that situation in words:

Pic. 5. The grails

That is a correct depiction of a common situation in science. As soon as scientists complete their work, the result appears in many forms instead of one and "the preferable one." Therefore, regardless of their positions, people come back to scientists and ask them for help again.

There is also another possibility. Scientists become asked to shut up when they reach something unique, creating significant cognitive dissonance in the human mind. In that case, "the governing bodies" like to follow the old set of categories instead of accelerating research in that particular area. Usually, the result of such a study or experiment becomes immediately "forbidden" for the scientific community and given civilization.

The movie shows that situation with help coming from Dr. Schneider.

Pic. 6. Dr. Schneider's action is in the form of the "helping hand of science."

Let me choose!

Thank you, Doctor!

Dr. Schneider gives the “right grail” to the person who needs help. That is a cornerstone action again. A person unquestioningly believes in anything that comes from Dr. Schneider. You have to think about that aspect again.

Usually, such blind actions lead to intellectual slavery as soon as persons reject their responsibility for action and put that responsibility on someone else. As a result, anything coming from “Dr. Schneider” becomes “the most valuable ideas that cannot be ever put under question.”

Allan opens a little secret for you now. He was astonished whenever students showed similar behavior. They tell Allan that they have to ask someone else if there is any uncertain situation in their research. No one told him he would go to the lab and conduct a relevant experiment to see more experimental data. No, they have no such idea. They mindlessly go to someone else and use his answer as “inevitable proof of science.” As you can see,

There is something more regarding the purpose of this site. The Aurora Effect can be seen in any pair of atomic clocks during their synchronization. However, no "scientist" has asked a question about that effect. Why?

The answer is astonishing. They have "textbooks" that describe "the right way of clock synchronization by round-trip measurements." They read those books and do everything described in them. As a result, they have never seen the Aurora Effect. That is the best example of absolute intellectual slavery lasting for decades. In other words,

Going back to the movie, we see a similar aspect. The person becomes delighted with "Dr. Schneider's help."

Pic. 7. The cup

That is one more example of intellectual slavery. Everything coming from Dr. Schneider looks like the best of the best (etc. for infinity). Having no competitive idea in their mind, such persons become ever blind to the only idea accessible to them.

However, the worst thing happens later. They decline any other idea that comes to their mind later because of cognitive dissonance, despite the value of that idea.

However, the physical experiment disproves false ideas. A person blind to his ideas takes real action to use them. Here, the superiority of physics appears. As soon as the experiment begins, the person has a strange feeling.

What is happening to me?

A few moments later, after drinking from a false grail, the person meets massive "biological dissonance" in the form of complete self-destruction. In the real world, a scientist blind with the wrong ideas meets a similar massive cognitive dissonance after a physical experiment and "becomes looking like this."

Pic. 8. The final stage of research in the form of biological and cognitive dissonance.

Such a result coincides with the warning given to the person before the experiment. 'You must choose, but choose wisely. For as the true grail will bring you life, the false grail will take it from you.'

Is there any more exact description of the situation? As soon as the result of research gives a scientist "the holy grail" in the area of science, the same "grail" keeps that scientist "alive" in the human mind. In other words, research that brings "the holy grail" to the hands of a scientist guarantees "Eternal life" for him.

At the same time, another "holy grail" that appeared after other research made decades or centuries later "takes that eternal life from the scientist" and makes him look like the person depicted in picture 8.

Suppose you have conducted a one-way experiment in your lab now. What happened next? Right, the old "and false prophet" stops his "eternal life" in your mind and subsequently in the human mind in general. Picture 8 shows that process in detail.

Coming back to the movie, we see this: The other person, Dr. Jones, makes another choice. He takes another grail with the words, 'It would not be made out of gold! That is the cup of a carpenter.'

In other words, the result of research estimated by incoming gold cannot be more than the knowledge itself.

Such a statement is underestimated in most cases. That means the first attempt to solve a problem may lead to a wrong result because of a researcher's lack of knowledge in a given field.

Therefore, despite all the "grants and payments" that "such genius" earned, the truth comes later and destroys his "eternal life forever." In the current situation in science, the Aurora Effect destroys Albert Einstein's "eternal life."